<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EICG Tax Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>HMRC not copying in agents, spells disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-not-copying-in-agents-spells-disaster</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-not-copying-in-agents-spells-disaster#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE tax codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its drive to cut costs HMRC will stop issuing copy letters to tax agents of P2 PAYE coding notices, P800 tax calculations and a collection of Self Assessment notices. “We hope that agents will understand our decision to withdraw these communications. We estimate… that we will save in the region of £1.25m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-what-are-they-up-to%2Fhmrc-not-copying-in-agents-spells-disaster"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-what-are-they-up-to%2Fhmrc-not-copying-in-agents-spells-disaster&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>As part of its drive to cut costs HMRC will stop issuing copy  letters to tax agents of P2 PAYE coding notices, P800 tax calculations  and a collection of Self Assessment notices.</p>
<p>“We hope that agents will understand our decision to withdraw these  communications. We estimate… that we will save in the region of £1.25m  by discontinuing the issue of agents’ copies of Forms P2 and P800  alone”</p>
<p>While withdrawing agent copies of some notices, HMRC will include a  new statement on the letters advising taxpayers that the form should be  shown to their agent or adviser. The notices affected include:</p>
<ul>
<li>P2  PAYE Coding Notices to be dropped from December 2010</li>
<li>P800 Tax Calculation (August/September 2010)</li>
<li>P810 targeted review form (already dropped in April)</li>
<li> SA 250 advising tax payer of UTR and need to file a return and SA  251 Letter advising that tax returns will no longer need to be completed  (both October 2010).</li>
<li>SA 252 Letter for those who don’t submit a tax return but are liable  to higher rate (September 2010, but already dropped since April).</li>
</ul>
<p>The CIOT published the message on its website and immediately raised a series of concerns. While  appreciating and supporting the need to cut government spending, the  CIOT warned that the move was a false economy.</p>
<p>“This is a seriously short-sighted move from the Revenue,” said CIOT  Deputy President Anthony Thomas. By keeping tax agents less  well-informed about their clients’ tax obligations HMRC are likely to  find they lose more money than they save.”</p>
<p>Calling on HMRC to reverse its stance, he added, “It is particularly  disappointing that this change is being sprung on taxpayers and their  agents with more or less immediate effect and without consultation.</p>
<p>“If they are set on proceeding, then much more effort will need to be  put into telling all taxpayers about the changes. At the moment all  that is planned is a message on letters from HMRC to taxpayers, but if  the taxpayer doesn’t read letters obviously from HMRC (which is not  uncommon, on the basis that they leave that to their agent) they will  not see the message on the letter telling them to show it to their  agent.</p>
<p>“Given that the vast majority of the costs involved in sending this  information to agents come from paper, printing and postage, a  consultation could also look at whether sending the information by email  offers a possible cheaper alternative to sending it by post.”</p>
<p>The HMRC notice acknowledged “hard decisions and choices will  inevitably have to be made” and indicated that it would continue to  review the need for existing forms and look for ways to rationalise its  printing and postage costs. The PAYE system, for example, will introduce  a new process from December 2010 in which P2s will not go out until all  2010 SA Returns (for those meeting the 31/1/2011 online filing  deadline) are captured. “This means that the code we issue will be based  on the information in the return and will avoid the need for amendments  had we issued the code earlier.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-not-copying-in-agents-spells-disaster/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC inspections to rise in order to collect more tax</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC inspections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC healthchecks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC PENALTIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A £158BN hole in the public finances means that HMRC are being used to try and raise extra cash for the Treasury, as quickly as possible and that will mean easy targets, so small and medium size firms, anyone in the construction industry are in the direct firing line for: employer compliance reviews PAYE/NIC investigations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fhmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fhmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>A £158BN hole in the public finances means that HMRC are being used to try and raise extra cash for the Treasury, as quickly as possible and that will mean easy targets, so small and medium size firms, anyone in the construction industry are in the direct firing line for:</p>
<p>employer compliance reviews</p>
<p>PAYE/NIC investigations</p>
<p>Employment status reviews</p>
<p>tax investigations</p>
<p>you name it and they are heading your way and don&#8217;t think it won&#8217;t happen to you &#8211; it will, so why not take advantage of the special deal that EICG is running this month on PAYE/NIC healthchecks and Construction Industry reviews, call us today on 0800 917 9176 to see how we can help you avoid being a victim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC delays</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-delays</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-delays#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current delays within HMRC are getting ridiculous and it&#8217;s not just the taxpayers that are having problems, even professional tax advisers are having problems. Sue Moore, associate director for BTT and A, has been struggling to get hold of anyone at HMRC. &#8220;We&#8217;re having difficulties when dealing with the HMRC. It would seem that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-what-are-they-up-to%2Fhmrc-delays"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-what-are-they-up-to%2Fhmrc-delays&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The current delays within HMRC are getting ridiculous and it&#8217;s not just the taxpayers that are having problems, even professional tax advisers are having problems.</p>
<p>Sue Moore, associate director for  BTT and A, has been struggling to get hold of  anyone at HMRC.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>We&#8217;re having difficulties when dealing with  the HMRC. It would seem that most offices are eight weeks behind  dealing with post. When you telephone it is just the call centre and if  you want to speak to somebody actually dealing with the case, that is  almost impossible. All this was before the cuts in the department  spending.</p>
<p>Everybody is affected by the delay. Issues take longer  to resolve and cost the clients more in professional fees as we have to  keep chasing HMRC. Working on a case is very inefficient as we have to  pick up the threads of the case after several months&#8217; delay.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Now we are finding that we are having to escalate matters in order to get a response to correspondence which is no good for anyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-delays/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late filing penalties for PAYE, NIC and CIS</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxinvestigations/late-filing-penalties-for-paye-nic-and-cis</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxinvestigations/late-filing-penalties-for-paye-nic-and-cis#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC PENALTIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS late filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HMRC announced in June that Extra Statuory Concession B46 (ESC B46) allowing a seven-day grace period for late employers’ and contractors’ returns will cease from 31 March 2011. ESC B46 established the principle that penalties would not be charged when employers and contractors submitting tax returns and CIS forms had taken “all reasonable steps” to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Ftaxinvestigations%2Flate-filing-penalties-for-paye-nic-and-cis"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Ftaxinvestigations%2Flate-filing-penalties-for-paye-nic-and-cis&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>HMRC announced in June that Extra Statuory Concession B46 (ESC  B46) allowing a seven-day grace period for late employers’ and  contractors’ returns will cease from 31 March 2011.</p>
<p>ESC B46 established the principle that penalties  would not be charged when employers and contractors submitting tax  returns and CIS forms had taken “all reasonable steps” to file their  returns on time, but were not able to do so due to unforeseen  circumstances such as postal delays.</p>
<p>With the advent of online filing, which is required for P35s and P14s  and will become mandatory for Corporation Tax returns from 1 April,  HMRC considers the concession to be “redundant” because the delays it  was intended to address will no longer happen. Returns must therefore  reach the department by their due date or incur a late filing penalty of  £100.</p>
<p>Confirming the new penalty regime HMRC explained: “Any customers filing a return late will, as  now, be able to request us to remove any penalty, if they believe they  had a reasonable excuse for the delay in filing. We will consider every  case on its own merits. Customers can also appeal against the penalty to  a Tribunal.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxinvestigations/late-filing-penalties-for-paye-nic-and-cis/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC are desparate for cash &#8211; surprise!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-are-desparate-for-cash-surprise</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-are-desparate-for-cash-surprise#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aspect enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross Tax Enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC cross tax reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HMRC are now out and about big style as they have told their Inspectors to bring in as much money as possible, as quickly as possible, which is not really surprising given the current economic environment.  There will be pressure to settle long running full enquiry cases and Inspectors will be encouraged to take up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fhmrc-are-desparate-for-cash-surprise"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fhmrc-are-desparate-for-cash-surprise&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>HMRC are now out and about big style as they have told their Inspectors to bring in as much money as possible, as quickly as possible, which is not really surprising given the current economic environment.  There will be pressure to settle long running full enquiry cases and Inspectors will be encouraged to take up aspect cases (these are as they sound, looking at a particular aspect of a business, eg <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status">employment status</a>, entertaining expenditure etc ) which are likely to be settled more quickly to optimise the tax yield in the current fiscal year.</p>
<p>Interestingly, it would appear that the new &#8220;Cross Tax&#8221; enquiry framework, involving PAYE/NIC, Corporation Tax, VAT etc is being shelved as it is slowing up the enquiry process so Inspectors will be reverting to just working their particular area</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/hmrc-are-desparate-for-cash-surprise/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Tax Investigation meetings!</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/virtual-tax-investigation-meetings</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/virtual-tax-investigation-meetings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we&#8217;ve all heard of how much money HMRC needs/should bring in with tax investigations, employment status reviews, PAYE investigations etc and as soon as possible you would think. Well, this morning was a relevation, in an attempt to speed up an enquiry I had agreed with the investigating officer that it would be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fvirtual-tax-investigation-meetings"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Fvirtual-tax-investigation-meetings&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Now we&#8217;ve all heard of how much money HMRC needs/should bring in with <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations.php">tax investigations</a>, <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status.php">employment status </a>reviews, PAYE investigations etc and as soon as possible you would think. Well, this morning was a relevation, in an attempt to speed up an enquiry I had agreed with the investigating officer that it would be a good idea to have a meeting, at our offices to go through the information they required, no problem until this morning. The very apologetic investigating officer explained that they had been told that due to all the cutbacks they were unable to travel for a meeting and would have to deal with the enquiry via correspondence and telephone. After checking it wasn&#8217;t 1st of April I said that this made no sense as this would prolong the enquiry because of HMRC backlogs etc to which to be fair the officer completely agreed, so what is going on &#8211; is this just a daft local decision or something more widespread?</p>
<p>HMRC you need to wake up and use some common sense &#8211; meetings can speed up the whole process &#8211; you are investigating someone or some entity, so they shouldn&#8217;t have to pick up the cost &#8211; you should be prepared to travel and guess what if there is a settlement to be made the money will be in the coffers quicker and the officers involved will be free to move onto another case &#8211; simples!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/virtual-tax-investigation-meetings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Business National Insurance Holiday Scheme &#8211; be careful</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-penalties/new-business-national-insurance-holiday-scheme-be-careful</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-penalties/new-business-national-insurance-holiday-scheme-be-careful#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers NIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Insurance Holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Insurance Holiday Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC PENALTIES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Budget announced a welcome break for new businesses outside the South East, that of a National Insurance Holiday giving new companies the chance to take on employees, the first 10 of which will not have employers NIC due for the first 12 months, giving a potential saving of £50,000 BUT and it is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-penalties%2Fnew-business-national-insurance-holiday-scheme-be-careful"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Fhmrc-penalties%2Fnew-business-national-insurance-holiday-scheme-be-careful&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The Budget announced a welcome break for new businesses outside the South East, that of a National Insurance Holiday giving new companies the chance to take on employees, the first 10 of which will not have employers NIC due for the first 12 months, giving a potential saving of £50,000 BUT and it is a big but for new businesses. The Budget statements have been released and alluded to the fact that new businesses from 22 June 2010 would potentially qualify but the scheme itself was unlikely to be ready until September &#8211; so immediate confusion caused &#8211; qualifying companies from 22 June but scheme not ready until September so many new businesses are thinking that the NIC holiday will apply to them if they set up business after 22 June &#8211; yes and no &#8211; not all companies will qualify (exclusions on fishing, agriculture and mining already mentioned) but the NIC holiday CAN&#8217;T start until the scheme officially starts, so even if you set up a company (and are trading) in the period 22 June to official scheme start up you CAN&#8217;T apply the NIC holiday, you need to operate the &#8220;normal&#8221; NIC rules and this may catch out a lot of new businesses. The NIC holiday will start when the scheme officially starts whether it be September of another future date. It is important that companies do not fall foul of this rule as penalties are drachonian. If you are in any doubt contact the employment tax expert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/hmrc-penalties/new-business-national-insurance-holiday-scheme-be-careful/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Investigation revenue to increase massively</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-revenue-to-increase-massively</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-revenue-to-increase-massively#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HMRC are planning a massive increase in the take from: tax investigations, employer compliance review, tax enquiries, employment status reviews and CIS reviews, so you have been warned HMRC plans to seize an extra £4bn in 2010/11 through more aggressive tax investigation work and tougher powers. To achieve such a high yield, HMRC will need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Ftax-investigation-revenue-to-increase-massively"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Ftax-investigation-revenue-to-increase-massively&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>HMRC are planning a massive increase in the take from: <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations.php">tax investigations</a>, employer compliance review, tax enquiries, <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status.php">employment status reviews</a> and CIS reviews, so you have been warned</p>
<p>HMRC plans to seize an extra £4bn in 2010/11  through more aggressive tax investigation work and tougher powers. To achieve such a high yield, HMRC will need to widen the scope of its  enquiry work to include marginal cases. This increases the risk innocent  businesses are caught up in a massive fishing exercise</p>
<p>Tax investigations can be hugely costly to taxpayers in respect of management  time, stress and advisory fees, while much of the tax HMRC  claws in through investigations is not tax that has been deliberately  evaded, in many cases it is the result of HMRC reinterpreting tax law and this brings in the well known scenario of my pockets are deeper than yours &#8211; otherwise known as if  an individual or business can&#8217;t afford to challenge HMRC&#8217;s decision  through the tribunals and court system, then HMRC wins.</p>
<p>So you have been warned, take specialist advice before it happens to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-revenue-to-increase-massively/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Investigation, Employment Status and HMRC penalty review system</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-employment-status-and-hmrc-penalty-review-system</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-employment-status-and-hmrc-penalty-review-system#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 10:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has now been a year since HMRC introduced the internal review system which was intended to be a bridge between the case worker and the First Tier Tribunal in cases such as tax investigations, employment status cases and HMRC penalties to name but a few areas. Initially viewed with suspicion, and still to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Ftax-investigation-employment-status-and-hmrc-penalty-review-system"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Femploymentstatus%2Ftax-investigation-employment-status-and-hmrc-penalty-review-system&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It has now been a year since HMRC introduced the internal review system which was intended to be a bridge between the case worker and the First Tier Tribunal in cases such as <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations.php">tax investigations</a>, <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status.php">employment status</a> cases and HMRC penalties to name but a few areas. Initially viewed with suspicion, and still to a certain extent, HMRC have published figures on the process to date.</p>
<p>Unrepresented tax payers have been relatively enthusiastic to use the system, probably on the basis of what have they got to lose &#8211; this made up 81% of those using the system. There are however strong distinctions to be drawn between automatic penalty cases where approximately half were cancelled compared with those that are far more substantiative. Even the latter category showed that about 25% were either cancelled or varied &#8211; so there is a definite moral here &#8211; don&#8217;t reject the internal review system out of hand it can be a useful process if dealt with correctly you just need to make sure the person dealing with your case understands the process. So, if you need advice call us today on 0800 917 9176</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/employmentstatus/tax-investigation-employment-status-and-hmrc-penalty-review-system/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>22 June 2010 &#8211; PAYE/NIC increases to be announced</title>
		<link>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/22-june-2010-payenic-increases-to-be-announced</link>
		<comments>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/22-june-2010-payenic-increases-to-be-announced#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 08:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers NIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-advice-blog/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well we have a date for the emergency Budget and that is 22 June 2010, but what can we expect: Increases in employees national insurance contributions, but not employers NIC Increase in the rate of Capital Gains Tax to probably 40% VAT rate to increase from 17.5% to 20% Increase in the level of PAYE/NIC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Ftaxadvice%2F22-june-2010-payenic-increases-to-be-announced"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eicg.co.uk%2Ftaxadvice%2F22-june-2010-payenic-increases-to-be-announced&amp;source=EmploymentTax&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Well we have a date for the emergency Budget and that is 22 June 2010, but what can we expect:</p>
<ul>
<li>Increases in employees national insurance contributions, but not employers NIC</li>
<li>Increase in the rate of Capital Gains Tax to probably 40%</li>
<li>VAT rate to increase from 17.5% to 20%</li>
<li>Increase in the level of <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations.php">PAYE/NIC compliance checks</a></li>
<li>Increase in the personal allowance level to nearer the £10,000 mark</li>
<li>A crack down on tax evasion, albeit HMRC cannot seemingly tell the difference between this and tax avoidance &#8211; the latter being perfectly legal</li>
</ul>
<p>The Government has indicated that most of the initial debt reduction will come from spending cuts rather than tax rises but we would recommend that you review all your employer compliance procedures with the help of an employment tax expert as they will be seeking extra revenue from basically whereever it can get it from &#8211; so call us today on 0800 917 9176 and see how we can save you money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/22-june-2010-payenic-increases-to-be-announced/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
